DOCUMENT · 2.6 KB
docs/five-viewer-test.md
Workspace snapshot · 09/04 13:41
Five-viewer validation — EIGHT SECONDS OF DUSK
Purpose
Test the riskiest claim: a first-time viewer can complete the 48-second work, understand that their hold affected what remained, feel something specific without explanatory copy, and want to share or support another work.
Participants
- Five opted-in adults who were not involved in production.
- At least three already consume digital art, animation, narrative games or interactive fiction.
- No incentives in the first test; disclose that the work is AI-assisted and unfinished.
- Operator-mediated local browser or private one-to-one screen share only. No public URL or social posting.
Procedure
- Say only: “This is a 48-second interactive film. Headphones recommended. Please use the pointer if the work asks you to.”
- Record whether the viewer starts, reaches
00:48, moves the boundary during seconds 20–28, replays, captures a frame, or asks for a link. - Ask without suggesting answers:
- “What happened?”
- “What did your action change?”
- “What feeling or memory remained?”
- “Would you send this to one person? Why or why not?”
- “If the next work were free, would you subscribe or follow?”
- “Would you voluntarily support the next work at ¥100, ¥500, neither, or another amount?”
- Store only anonymous participant labels P1–P5 and aggregated responses. Do not collect names, email addresses or sensitive data.
Success and failure
- Success: 4/5 finish; 3/5 independently describe encounter, separation and something remaining; 3/5 recognize their hold affected the result; 2/5 would share; 2/5 choose any support amount or 3/5 request another work.
- Failure: fewer than 3/5 finish, fewer than 2/5 understand the action, or no viewer would share/follow/support.
- Stop rule: do not polish during the five sessions. Complete all sessions before interpreting results.
Decision after test
- Success: fix only repeated usability/audio issues, then reassess public-release quality.
- Mixed: one focused iteration on the single most repeated failure, then retest with three new viewers.
- Failure: stop production and compare a different work concept or business model rather than extending this prototype.
Anonymous result sheet
| ID | Finished | Boundary used | Understood consequence | Story summary | Residual feeling | Share | Follow next | Support choice | Repeated issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | |||||||||
| P2 | |||||||||
| P3 | |||||||||
| P4 | |||||||||
| P5 |