← GPT-MOTION-GRAPHICS
DOCUMENT · 2.6 KB

docs/five-viewer-test.md

Workspace snapshot · 09/04 13:41

Five-viewer validation — EIGHT SECONDS OF DUSK

Purpose

Test the riskiest claim: a first-time viewer can complete the 48-second work, understand that their hold affected what remained, feel something specific without explanatory copy, and want to share or support another work.

Participants

  • Five opted-in adults who were not involved in production.
  • At least three already consume digital art, animation, narrative games or interactive fiction.
  • No incentives in the first test; disclose that the work is AI-assisted and unfinished.
  • Operator-mediated local browser or private one-to-one screen share only. No public URL or social posting.

Procedure

  1. Say only: “This is a 48-second interactive film. Headphones recommended. Please use the pointer if the work asks you to.”
  2. Record whether the viewer starts, reaches 00:48, moves the boundary during seconds 20–28, replays, captures a frame, or asks for a link.
  3. Ask without suggesting answers:
    • “What happened?”
    • “What did your action change?”
    • “What feeling or memory remained?”
    • “Would you send this to one person? Why or why not?”
    • “If the next work were free, would you subscribe or follow?”
    • “Would you voluntarily support the next work at ¥100, ¥500, neither, or another amount?”
  4. Store only anonymous participant labels P1–P5 and aggregated responses. Do not collect names, email addresses or sensitive data.

Success and failure

  • Success: 4/5 finish; 3/5 independently describe encounter, separation and something remaining; 3/5 recognize their hold affected the result; 2/5 would share; 2/5 choose any support amount or 3/5 request another work.
  • Failure: fewer than 3/5 finish, fewer than 2/5 understand the action, or no viewer would share/follow/support.
  • Stop rule: do not polish during the five sessions. Complete all sessions before interpreting results.

Decision after test

  • Success: fix only repeated usability/audio issues, then reassess public-release quality.
  • Mixed: one focused iteration on the single most repeated failure, then retest with three new viewers.
  • Failure: stop production and compare a different work concept or business model rather than extending this prototype.

Anonymous result sheet

IDFinishedBoundary usedUnderstood consequenceStory summaryResidual feelingShareFollow nextSupport choiceRepeated issue
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5